Warning: I will be discussing major plot points, and the ending. So if you have not seen the movie yet stop reading.
I have this theory that the more hype I hear about how great a movie is, the more disappointing it will actually turn out to be. I was delightfully surprised in 1995 when, after several months out in the theaters, I
finally let a friend drag me to see Forrest
Gump. That movie lived up to the hype. It was that good.
I was also pleasantly surprised two months ago when I went and finally saw Gran
Torino. Again, a great story that ran the gamut from hilarious to heart-breaking. Well done.
But my first thoughts after walking out of the
Slumdog Millionaire theater (actually before I even walked out) were that this story was not "believable." And the lack of believability was at many levels. Perhaps I'm just a naive American who doesn't understand the horrible lifestyles that the rest of the world lives in. If so, then the world is in greater trouble than I thought (and I already thought we were in a great deal of trouble as it was). But, even aside from the horrors of the children (which, honestly, I'll have to do some research on), there were
so many things about this movie that I just didn't buy.
First and foremost... If I've just spent the night being tortured (...and I don't mean lightly tortured, like being smacked around a little bit. I mean really harshly tortured by near drowning, and then being strung up to hang while electrodes are run through me...) If I've spent the whole evening and next day going through that, and then find myself sitting on national television with millions of people watching later that evening- the first words out of my mouth certainly are not going to be "Yes I'm ready to play for more money." They're going to be more like, "I want the world to know that you had me tortured last night you sadistic bastard!"
Also, how many times did that guy "go back" for his girl? If you're infatuated with a girl (or, ladies, if you're infatuated with a guy), and you have to go back again, and again, and again, and again... and
again to win her back- she ain't worth it! And I didn't buy the
convenient ending, either. If his purpose for going on the show was to find his long-lost girl, then why did he wait until the end to call her? I suppose one could argue that the more he won, the more attention he knew the show would get, and therefore he waited so the viewing audience would build. But what if he missed a question and got booted off the show before getting to use his phone a friend lifeline?
That was an even bigger gamble than the questions themselves were. Nope, I just didn't believe any of that.
The
realistic movie would have lasted 5 minutes. It would have been some kid on the millionaire show being introduced by the host... "Well, Jamal, why don't you tell us a little about yourself?"
"I'm an 18 year old kid who has been through unmentionable horrors! My girlfriend was kidnapped and forced into prostitution as a child! I haven't seen her in years, and I know that she is being held by organized crime lords! Latika, where are you! I love you, and I want to rescue you! Help police- didn't you hear me? My girlfriend was kidnapped by the mob!" Now, aside from the plot holes, there were other things that I just didn't like about this movie. It was two hours of exposure to a story of how misguided children can grow up to become gangsters. Halfway through the movie I found myself thinking, "How is this movie any different from (Brian De
Palma's 1983 Al Pacino film) Scarface?" Both movies had me feeling that I wasn't being shown any positive values at all. They were both just bad stories about how a bad person grows up realising the benefits of being bad, and as a result gets worse until he meets his demise in a spray of bullets. I never saw the appeal of Scarface. I never understood the infatuation with that evil rise to power. Why is that entertainment? If I didn't like seeing a grown man go through it, why would I have any interest in seeing some little kid go through it?
If the movie was supposed to take place in the present, then the horrible things this kid went through in his childhood were just 10 - 15 years ago. I am going to have to do some human rights research into recent Indian history and see if there is any validity to the claims that this movie makes about the horrible lifestyle in that country. I think I'll start with the Amnesty International web page and see what they have to say. I respect that organization. If you are curious as I am, then you can read what they have to say
here.
Long story short: this was a two hour ordeal to sit through. A long, slow, depressing story, with unrealistic, unbelievable circumstances, and a neat, tidy ending that honestly just didn't work.
(And what the heck was with that Thriller video in the end all about?)
I was disappointed.
Slumdog didn't fly. The real best movie of 2008 was Gran
Torino.